Bill Lovell wrote: > > Again, as to ICANN, is it not understood that a possible result of the > NTIA meeting is that ICANN will disappear? The action that counts is > now March 10 in D. C. > If you're referring to the meeting on 9 March that you posted the URL for last night, that meeting covers *only* the future of the .us domain. It's relevant to issues involving other domains only to the extent that the fact that the USG is holding such a meeting makes clear its position WRT the ccTLD "sovereignty" issue.
- [IFWP] Re: [Membership] Re: Individual ... Bob Allisat
- [IFWP] Re: [Membership] Re: Indivi... Joop Teernstra
- [IFWP] Corporate Sponsorship o... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Corporate Spons... Sue Chooi/Woo Wei Xian(Zen) [Exch]
- RE: [IFWP] Corporate Spons... John B. Reynolds
- RE: [IFWP] Corporate S... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Corporate S... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Corpor... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Co... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Corporate Spons... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Corporate S... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Corporate S... Bill Lovell
- RE: [IFWP] Corpor... John B. Reynolds
