Bill Lovell wrote:
>
> At 12:52 PM 2/17/99 -0500, you [Michael Sondow] wrote:
> >Bill Lovell a �crit:
> >
> >> Again, as to ICANN, is it not understood that a possible result of the
> >> NTIA meeting is that ICANN will disappear?
> >
> >Are you talking here about the NTIA meeting on .US? If so, I don't
> >think it has very much to do with ICANN's future, does it?
>
> Look at:
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/domainhome.htm
>
> as derived from the link given. The different proposals as to who will
> be NewCorp are linked in. One may safely assume that to be a
> hidden agenda in any meeting.
>
That page has contained links for both the Green/White Paper process and the
.us Domain Space RFC for several months now. They are on the same page only
because they both relate to the general topic of "Management of Internet
Names and Addresses", not because there is some covert link between the two.
One may safely assume that ICANN and .us domain reform remain separate
issues to NTIA.
