In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kent Crispin writes:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 08:08:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> > a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> > (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> > most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> > related. InterNIC was not a registry.
>
> The question of whether the Internic was a registry or a registrar is
> totally irrelevant -- more of the disingenuous obfuscation that you
> dispense so expertly.
Ah, the K*nt again. At least disingenous obfuscation is an area where
he has genuine expertise.
el
