Whomever this might be and all,
Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kent Crispin writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 08:08:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> > > a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> > > (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> > > most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> > > related. InterNIC was not a registry.
> >
> > The question of whether the Internic was a registry or a registrar is
> > totally irrelevant -- more of the disingenuous obfuscation that you
> > dispense so expertly.
>
> Ah, the K*nt again. At least disingenous obfuscation is an area where
> he has genuine expertise.
Well it would be more accurate to say that Kent Crispin, has
*Attempted*
to practice "disingenous obfuscation", with little success. He is
a rank amature, though none the less certianly and avid amature....
>
>
> el
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
