In message <000201be76ca$2c4f04c0$0100000a@jbr>, "John B. Reynolds" writes:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> > a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> > (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> > most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> > related. InterNIC was not a registry. There was no
> > registry, but there will be shortly.
> >
> > Chuck
>
> "There was no registry"?!
I read that as a comment with regards to the web site.
el
