At 07:26 AM 3/25/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 08:08:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
>> a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
>> (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
>> most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
>> related. InterNIC was not a registry.
>
>The question of whether the Internic was a registry or a registrar is
>totally irrelevant -- more of the disingenuous obfuscation that you
>dispense so expertly.
Uh Kent,
Weren't you paying attention? Someone *demanded* an answer from him. He
gave one, now you castigate him, not for the answer he gave, but for
providing an answer. If you are going to be anal retentive, at least try to
look intelligent while doing so.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!
