A: Not an option, if I go above 100mW my equipment will be taken away plus there will be one hell of a fine. (Netherlands, max. allowed is 100mW.) B: I don't think I've got devices supporting that standard. Only b/g. C: I already use wires, mostly, but I want to keep my laptop wireless. Just not with 200kBps.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Adam Thompson Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2011 18:41 Aan: pfSense support and discussion Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense] Replacing a Linux router with pfSense At that point, lining your entire apartment with copper mesh might be your only option! You could also A) switch to a high-power AP, and drown out your neighbours, B) switch to 802.11a, C) use wires. At that level of penetration, it would be good practice for the building to become it's own ISP... Likely too late for that, though. -Adam Bart Grefte <[email protected]> wrote: >Already tried channel 1, makes no difference. > >No WISP, just adsl-modem/router/AP combo's. Wireless AP's have been >standard for a while now in the equipment of the ISP's that are placed >at people's homes. There will be a lot more since the local >cable-provider is replacing the current modem's with modem's that have a build-in router and AP. > >Changing the antenna's position on my Senao ECB-3220, and even replace >it with a 9dbi antenna did not help. > > >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] >Namens Tim Nelson >Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2011 18:08 >Aan: pfSense support and discussion >Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense] Replacing a Linux router with pfSense > >Ugh, the last message was sent before I intended... > >You should set your wireless equipment on a non-overlapping channel >different than those around you. From the screenshot you gave, channel >1 looks to be about the best bet. > >Also, I'm seeing a lot of 'Sitecom' stuff. Is that a local WISP? It is >very likely the amount of traffic on those AP's alone accounts for the >interference you're seeing. > >You may need to check your antenna orientation also. Typically, on >omnidirectional antennas, the signal is radiated at a perpendicular >angle to the antenna orientation. So, if your antennas are pointed >straight up(vertically), signal should be coming horizontally. This is >an oversimplified view, but roughly correct. > >I'm not a wireless "expert", but I hope these tips give you a few items >to go on for better performance. > >Tim Nelson >Systems/Network Support >Rockbochs Inc. >(218)727-4332 x105 > >----- Original Message ----- >> You could very well have channel spacing issues. There are only a few >> channels that do not overlap. Please see details here for specific >> wifi >> implementations:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#Channels_and >> _ >> international_compatibility >> >> Tim Nelson >> Systems/Network Support >> Rockbochs Inc. >> (218)727-4332 x105 >> >_______________________________________________ >List mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > >_______________________________________________ >List mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
