Howdy Russ:
 
> You miss the point, as  well.  "BACK?" to 16-bit systems???
> Both 16-bit AND  8-bit  micros are alive  and well   in the
> embedded  world.. surprise!  Just take  a  look at the very
> active  development      of  new   chips     at   Microchip
> (www.microchip.com) or    Hitachi   for  current  examples.
> Perhaps the upcoming    PIC 2000  contest  co-sponsored  by
> Circuit        Cellar    INK      and             Microchip
> (http://www.circuitcellar.com/pic2000/)      serves      to
> illustrate just  some   of the _current_  interest  in this
> area.

  Hey-- cool.  Thanks for the pointers.  Truth be told no
  one's really voiced the desire for DOS support in these
  terms, and your arguments seem pretty compelling. 

  Maybe with more research on our part we can provide a more
  meaningful response.  
 
> It  was certainly not  my intention to begin or participate
> in a  flame contest  over   this.  I  simply  asked what  I
> thought was a very straightforward, logical, and meaningful
> question...  and I'm still   looking  for a direct  answer.

  Well, porting to DOS poses a few problems for us, ones that
  we're not in any state to take on right now.  This doesn't
  mean we'd never do it, but that's no indication that we
  would do it some day either.  We don't have a truly
  definitive answer, right now.  If we look into embedd market
  deeper and discover that DOS is everywhere, and that's where
  we want to go, then we'd probably reassess the priority of
  DOS.  But for now, I can say definitively that DOS is not
  even on the map for us, priority-wise.  As you imply, this
  might not be smart on our part, but that's up to other
  executive dudes around the office to figure out.  I'm just a
  developer, what do I know? (-: ( Passin' the buck.. our
  favorite hobby next to sarcasm :-) )

> Perhaps this is the wrong forum.  From private replies I've
> received  re this issue  from others who  read this list, I
> can see    that other   embedded system  people    share my
> views... guess we're just usually the silent types who work
> our magic behind the scenes.  Back I go...

  Please continue to contribute to our list.  Your input is
  appreciated.

  -jeff

Reply via email to