>-----Original Message----- >From: Micky Mourelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >> The important factor here it consistency across the site. > >Are you sure? I find myself often debating this sort of issue. I don't >think tagging a subsection as H3 on one page should mean that that >subsection will always be marked as an H3; in fact I know it >shouldn't, if you do not mention the section(e.g. H2) on the document >you should not tag the subsection as H3. >HTML marks documents not sites. My interpretation of this issue is that we're talking about the consistent application of hierarchical elements and therefore, their semantic meaning to a user. Who are the typical users who rely on this type of element/markup? Micky, I understand your point that HTML marks up pages and not sites, but the fact that pages are linked to each other implies a relationship, doesn't it? So for that reason I would agree with Patrick's comment. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
