On 1/12/07, John Foliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mihael Zadravec wrote: > > logo is just logo, and has relevance only for sighted users. I have been away from this list for a while now... When did it stop being a web standards forum and become instead a web opinion forum?
Isn't forum all about opinions and discussions? :) Mihael, what supporting evidence do you have for this claim? Personal expirience. While a company's logo or word mark may *primarily* be for visual
representation of the company, I would also venture that if I spoke of "the swoosh" logo, or "the golden arches" even many non-sighted people would know I was referring to Nike and the MacDonald's hamburger chain. You need to be *very* careful when stating things that you specify if they are "fact" or "opinion", as I take great exception to your factual stating of an opinion here... Sorry too if I come off "grouchy", but this is important! JF
After all... You can put whatever you want in heading tags... but we all know that for the best screen reader users expirience, it is still better that headeings contain text only... ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
