On 1/16/07, Barney Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I swear we just had this thread last week, but can't find it in the back-catalog. Must be getting my lists confused.Mihael, I share your view that <h1><img/></h1> is a bit ugly. I'm aware from extensive debate that the following idea is pretty unpopular, but I like to assign an id to my <h1> and style it to display the logo... <h1 id="logo">Corporation Ltd.</h1> h1#logo { display: block; width: #; height: #; background-image: url(#); background-repeat: no-repeat; text-size: 1px; text-decoration: none; color: [background-colour]; text-size: 0; }
...
and that even if it does work, any user agent that has disabled images will make the whole <h1> illegible. Valid points, but I haven't bumped into them yet to the best of my knowledge :P.
Maybe because no self-respecting user is going to take the time to contact you and let you know that your page doesn't quite work for them. Then again, it's not the main content of the page... maybe some users don't care if they can't see it at all. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net .. designtocss.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
