Michael, > No, no, no! A DIV is semantically neutral, ie has no meaning > whatsoever. The addition of a class name does not change that. So how > can a pair of DIV's have more meaning than a specific HTML element?
Yes a DIV is semantically neutral, but it has a structural meaning. And HR doesn't have a semantic meaning either, it's just visual with a structural implication. I prefer the DIV because it shows beginning and end of the structural group. HR doesn't do that, it just marks the end. But one should consider that HR has an advantage: some text-browsers and screen readers will render it, the DIV is simply ignored if it isn't addressed by css. regards Martin ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
