[Caskey, please configure your MTA to fold lines.] On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Caskey Dickson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:01:56PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > P.S. If you want your Outlook users to be happier, I suggest you switch > > > to Exchange. > > > > Lighten up, Caskey. > > Perhaps I put that too bluntly for you to understand what I meant so I shall > elaborate. > > If *your* objective is happy users and for *your* users to be happy they > need bug-compatible interoperability with Outlook, then you are going > about that objective all wrong, furthermore I respectfully submit that > arguments for Binc to behave in a certain way must be well reasoned > and/or backed up with patches. I am not talking about bug-compatibility at all; you distort the debate by suggesting that I am. I quoted RFC2060; bincimap SHOULD be doing some things that it doesn't. It's clearly not off-topic to discuss the issue here. > Regardles, with the wonders of the GPL, we are all free to fork and > release our own version with all the particular features, misfeatures > and benefits we feel Binc ought to have. Users either will or will not > use it. One's willingness to do so is simply a reflection of how > closely our desires align with those of the developers/maintainers. Sure, but I hope you are not suggesting that projects should be forked without any discussion. -- Charlie
