I guess this didn't get exposed during pilot testing?

I don't know if you're going to be able to get help with this one, but
you've certainly ensured that many other organizations won't be likely to
deploy it.


*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market…*

* GPG: *1AF3 EEC3 7C3C E88E B0EF 4319 8F28 A483 A182 EF3A


On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Steve Cain <[email protected]> wrote:

> That would have been my choice too, but we are a small 200+ client shop
> and the majority of them have Windows 7 Pro installed. We only have like 2
> copies of Win 7 Enterprise installed. :-(
>
>
> Steve Cain
> Sr. System Administrator
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Why would you choose to use this instead of BitLocker and MBAM?
>>
>>
>>
>> Just curious.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Cain
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:52 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] SecureDoc software
>>
>>
>>
>>   AD syncing issues, sometimes we get duplicate user accounts in the
>> SecureDoc Enterprise management console, sometimes syncing breaks entirely
>> and you either have to restart the service or reboot the server to get it
>> working again. Sometimes our SA keys don't get pre-staged down to the hard
>> drives so you can't login, maybe that is related to the duplicate account
>> issues. The Enterprise console only runs on the server, wish we had one
>> that each SA could install on their own workstation. They have a web
>> version too but it's not full featured and annoying to use. And when you
>> install upgrades on the server it totally uninstalls and re-installs the 2
>> services and after it completes you have to register the services manually
>> with Windows and then re-enter your configuration settings for the two.
>>
>>
>>
>>    I feel the whole product is overly complex and bloated for what it
>> needs to do, at least with the Enterprise version. There are configuration
>> settings in 4 or 5 different places with multiple pages of settings within
>> each one of those places sometimes. And they have no support forums or user
>> community to seek help from, just their tech support. They are responsive,
>> usually replying in less than an hour, but their support website and
>> documentation is sorely lacking and I have to have 3 separate accounts on
>> their site, one for the site, one for their KB and one for their customer
>> support portal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve Cain
>>
>> Sr. System Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Gordon Pegue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Considering.
>>
>> What kind of issues are you dealing with?
>>
>>
>>
>> Gordon
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Cain
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 10:25 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Re: You have subscribed to
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone else here using or tried WinMagic's SecureDoc drive encryption
>> software? Boss purchased SecureDoc Enterprise Server and it's been nothing
>> but trouble since we deployed it. Just wondering if it's just us or if
>> others have had similar struggles with it. I wouldn't wish this software on
>> my worst enemy! :-)
>>
>>
>> Steve Cain
>>
>> Sr. System Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to