>  
> 
> I neither wrote nor implied it was.  The Law of the Sea is rather 
> complicated but included therein is the right, if I remember correctly, 
> of innocent passage that allows transit within defined borders to 
> friendly vessels.  There is no law I’m aware of that grants the right 
> *to live where one is not wanted*.  

There IS an international treaty and laws that 
follow that say a boat "in navigation" also has 
the right to anchor.

> 1. The US Code of Federal Regulations, Corpus Juris Segunchun states that the 
> common right of the
> public to use navigable water for navigation is superior to other rights in 
> the water, and it not confined to the
> main channel, but extends over the entire surface of the water, from shore to 
> shore, subject only to natural.
> obstructions and lawful artificial obstructions and that the public may 
> exercise tea right of navigation in a 
> reasonable manner for either business or pleasure and in either large or 
> small watercraft. It includes the
> incidental rights of anchorage and mooring.
> 
>       2. Federal Maritime Law, Chapter IX. entitled, The Sea and Jurisdiction 
> over Federal waters Section
> 141, entitled, "The Sea, the Primary Maritime Local, Navigational Waters" pg 
> 9-11, states that Navigable inland
> rivers and lakes susceptible of use as highways of interstate and 
> international commerce are within the
> admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.ā€ Federal waters are defined as: "All 
> tidal waters including the rivers,
> canals and lakes that interconnect,ā€ which include the inland waters that are 
> accesisble to the Sea.
> 
>       3. US Code Annotated states that riparian owner having qualified title 
> to submerged soil is entiltled
> to no preference over the public generally with respect to use of navigable 
> waters, whether for navigation,
> business, or pleasure.
> 
>       4 The U.S. Constitution, Article VI. reads: This Constitution and the 
> Laws of the U.S. which shall be
> made in pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shalt he made 
> under the Authority of the U.S.
> shall be the supreme law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be 
> bound thereby, any Thing In the
> Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
>       Article IV, (Bill Of Rights, July 21 1868) states that No state shall 
> make or enforce any law which
> shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the U.S.


And then from a "Cruising World" Magazine special 
report;


>                   In December 2001, the city of Tampa decided to clean up an 
>                   area known as Davis Islands Seaplane Basin. Andy Bartley, 
> who 
>                   runs a one-man landscaping company in the city, found a 
> letter 
>                   on his boat informing him that he had 60 days to remove his 
>                   boat or it would be impounded by the city. The letter 
> asserted 
>                   that his boat and others were anchored there without a 
> permit, 
>                   yet when he called to obtain a permit, he was told that 
>                   permits didn't exist.
> 
>                   "You're telling me that I'm here illegally without a 
> permit, 
>                   but there are no permits," he said. "It was a Catch-22."
> 
> 
>                   Bulldozer Politics
>                   The city of Tampa then said that the boats must be moved 
>                   because the owners were dumping sewage into the water, 
> which 
>                   is already prohibited by state law. "Governments don't 
> remove 
>                   splinters with tweezers," Bartley said. "They use a 
>                   bulldozer."
> 
>                   Bartley and some other boat owners decided to conduct a 
> little 
>                   research. After doing a title search, they found that the 
> city 
>                   didn't own or lease the submerged land in question. He 
>                   convinced about 20 owners to chip in $6,000, and hiring 
>                   land-use attorneys, they were able to defeat the city in 
>                   court. Even though Bartley wound up buying a boat that had 
> a 
>                   slip in a marina, he said he has no regrets. "I'm just real 
>                   proud of our group because we stood up for our rights and 
>                   showed the city that we weren't going to let them walk all 
>                   over us," he said.
> 
>                   According to Ankersen, the main question is this: How long 
>                   does a boat have to be anchored before its owners are no 
>                   longer exercising the rights of navigation? "Any timeline 
> you 
>                   put on that is arbitrary," he said. "While the 'exercise of 
>                   the rights of navigation' hasn't been defined judicially or 
>                   statutorily, the Florida attorney general has stated that 
> the 
>                   right of navigation includes the right to anchor and moor. 
>                   However, the attorney general noted that such a right 
> doesn't 
>                   include the right to anchor indefinitely."
> 
>                   Invariably, when a boat owner is defending his right to 
>                   anchor, whether it be to a city council, a policeman, or a 
>                   harbormaster, he or she will argue that anchoring is 
> included 
>                   within the right to navigate, which is protected by federal 
>                   maritime law. Ankersen's report examined several such cases 
>                   and concluded, "Local regulation is not pre-empted by 
> federal 
>                   law." But he does believe that cruisers stand a chance of 
>                   overturning a city's anchoring ordinance because of the 
>                   wording of Florida Statute 327.6. Since the only cases 
> testing 
>                   the validity of cities' anchoring ordinances have been in 
>                   county courts, there's not a clear standard for cities or 
>                   owners to measure themselves against. "Until a case like 
> this 
>                   is challenged in an appeals court, we won't have a legal 
>                   precedent for how long the right to navigate lasts," he 
> said.




Melborn does not own the water regardless of what 
they or others think.
If such policies stand it is the proverbial 
camel's nose, except we've gone far past that now.
> 
>  
> 
> I have every intention of moving aboard and living overseas. 


I like to cruise and see many different countries, 
however, the US is MY country and I hate to see 
our freedoms dwindle. And they are. -Ken

_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to