On 06/17/2014 05:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > It's a bit off-topic from this discussion, but the per-note settings > would be quite great for SF2.
Wouldn't work, at least as long as we use fluidsynth for SF2 playback. Fluidsynth sets patches per-synth, we can't set them per-note. > This may also be better suited for the LB302 accent now that you > describe it that way. It depends. There's no solid plan or timeline for implementing per-note controls, it's just something that has been hypothesized and talked about. It also still has some problems to be worked out (eg. how does it work with live play? how to connect midi controllers to per-note controls? etc.) The question is, do we want to wait for something that may be implemented at some undefined time, or do we want to get accent implemented sooner? Theoretically, if we use note volume for accent now and want to sometime in the future transition in to using a per-note control (although, as LB-302 only plays one note at a time, it doesn't really give that much advantage for it), it could probably be done with a backwards-compat hack. > Does MIDI have a channel for patches and banks? Would it be proper > to treat it like an SF2 patch/bank and "hit a few birds" with this > one? (not trying to underestimate the amount of work for the per-note > enhancement of course). MIDI has some kind of program switch support. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
