Am 29.08.2012 02:10, schrieb Tim E. Real: > Cross fading parts on the same track? > At first that didn't seem to make much sense to me, > but I think I can see the point. > But each part would need a volume controller.
not neccessarily a user-accessible one. imo, the user shall only be able
to set fade-in and fade-out points (possibly also "linear fade" or
"logarithmic", but that's not important right now), and muse will ALWAYS
fade from 0% to 100% and vice versa.
> We don't have that mechanism.
> For now it is easier to just shorten the length of the first part.
huh? shorten the length? why would we want to shorten any lengths?
>
> To me, cross fading is to be done from track to track.
> The last time I thought about this intensely, I concluded
> I would probably try to do something like: click two tracks,
> click a button, and it cross fades at the current cursor position.
>
> But same-track part cross fading?... Hm interesting...
>
and i just found a huge flaw in my idea: there are cases where you need
something mightier.
three use cases:
1. have two lengthy tunes on an instrument which you want to crossfade
2. have a one-measure drum-pattern you want to play 4 more times while
crossfading to a different drum-pattern.
3. have a whole piece of music (or at least, a big part of it, with
multiple parts) which you want to fade.
ad 1.) this works perfectly fine with my proposed fading mechanism
ad 3.) this definitely can't work with my mechanism; we'd need a track-
fading solution, but i had in mind that my feature can't handle
this use-case.
ad 2.) hmm tricky. my feature was intended to be able to handle that.
but obviously it can't work right now. but this will snap in with
my second proposal (see the other mail) about templated parts.
(abstract: you just don't have lots of 1-measure-clones when you
want drum patterns etc, but create a "template part" instead.
that's a special kind of part which allows you combine several
templates (one template would be equivalent to one one-measure-
clone-part) plus more really fancy stuff. that template part will
be lengthy enough to do the fading you want. problem solved.
i think this feature is something between "extremely nice to have" and
even "important", though it cannot replace track-fading.
but i want it to exist next to the track-fading. are you okay with that?
> We'll see, visual stuff can be worked out later.
true, lets postpone the visual stuff.
greetings
flo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
