It seems that most people on the list agreed to wait for for the publication of the domain concept.
Btw., it looks as if you have a misconception on how open-source works. A lot of effort has gone into log4j development, and you can get the results *for free*. If at all, then we as users owe something to the developers, not the other way around. Of course, you can make proposals for change, you can bring forward your arguments, etc. But if the developers decide not to make that change, being insistent doesn't seem to be an appropriate attitude.
+1
While everyone is very much encouraged make contributions, this does not mean that we (the developers) have to immediately agree with every request. In the particular case of the TRACE level, I think more time is needed to reach a decision.
Here is a Wiki page where people can express their views. http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/TraceDebate
--Wolf
-- Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp import org.apache.Facetime;
ApacheCon US 2003, 18-21 November http://apachecon.com/--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
