On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 09:57 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
| While everyone is very much encouraged make contributions, this does
| not mean that we (the developers) have to immediately agree with every
| request. In the particular case of the TRACE level, I think more time
| is needed to reach a decision.
Seen the pdf from jboss' lawyers? ("geronimo-dev")
They're using jboss' Trace level extension to log4j as an exhibit - =since
apparently also Geronimo is making this extension=!!
That's cute; even Apache's internal projects have to extend the log4j
package with trace (even the largest such project ever in Apache's Java
history?), since the log4j developers/maintainers refuse to add it.
What's really interesting about this is that JBoss appears to have violated the Apache license in doing so, and then submitted it as an example.
LOL
So both Jboss and Geronimo have to extend log4j by adding trace - two
quite "largish" Java projects. Is that valid as an argument for including
that level?
E.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
