On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
| While everyone is very much encouraged make contributions, this does
| not mean that we (the developers) have to immediately agree with every
| request. In the particular case of the TRACE level, I think more time
| is needed to reach a decision.
Seen the pdf from jboss' lawyers? ("geronimo-dev")
They're using jboss' Trace level extension to log4j as an exhibit - =since
apparently also Geronimo is making this extension=!!
That's cute; even Apache's internal projects have to extend the log4j
package with trace (even the largest such project ever in Apache's Java
history?), since the log4j developers/maintainers refuse to add it.
So both Jboss and Geronimo have to extend log4j by adding trace - two
quite "largish" Java projects. Is that valid as an argument for including
that level?
E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
