At 03:22 PM 11/10/2003 +0100, Endre Stĝlsvik wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Ceki Gülcü wrote:

|
| I think the text could benefit from some structure.

I used the following typographical features to group and structure the
text:

 * Headings
 * Bold (for sub-headings)
 * Bullet points
 * Fixed width fonts
 * Horizontal bars/rules

I heavily edited the text. If you feel that I have done it injustice, please accept my apologies.


Btw; the excellent argument going something like "so many people already
have had to make the trace level themselves, that by incorporating it into
log4j natively, we might break their hacks to depserately get the said
feature" was really something!

That's not from me, probably from Yoav. Although compatibility is a very important consideration, compatibility is not a good reason against the TRACE level (assuming that JBoss et al. can cope with the change.)


;)

Endre.

-- Ceki Gülcü

     For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
     ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp

     import org.apache.Facetime;
     ApacheCon US 2003, 18-21 November http://apachecon.com/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to