I think pulling in component would make sense...no one else probably uses it. Receivers? I suppose if they were built as a separate jar that'd be fine too, I have no idea who uses them if anyone.
Scott On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: > At this point I'm only focusing only on 2.0. I've been wondering if I > should create a subproject for chainsaw or if it should remain separate. I > already moved a large part of extras in as a core part of the functionality. > > Ralph > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > Curt had an interesting idea lately, he mentioned it might make sense > > to move the companions code into chainsaw. > > What do you think on that? > > > > I like the idea - less releases, and no other interested parties in > > having companions. > > > > Please comment, when you can :-) > > > > Cheers > > Christian > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
