On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> At this point I'm only focusing only on 2.0. I've been wondering if I should 
> create a subproject for chainsaw or if it should remain separate. I already 
> moved a large part of extras in as a core part of the functionality.

B/c of Chainsaw2 builds upon log4j2, I think I would create a
subproject. This would make it easier to release Chainsaw version for
a specific log4j2 release

>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> Curt had an interesting idea lately, he mentioned it might make sense
>> to move the companions code into chainsaw.
>> What do you think on that?
>>
>> I like the idea - less releases, and no other interested parties in
>> having companions.
>>
>> Please comment, when you can :-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to