On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > At this point I'm only focusing only on 2.0. I've been wondering if I should > create a subproject for chainsaw or if it should remain separate. I already > moved a large part of extras in as a core part of the functionality.
B/c of Chainsaw2 builds upon log4j2, I think I would create a subproject. This would make it easier to release Chainsaw version for a specific log4j2 release > > Ralph > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Scott, >> >> Curt had an interesting idea lately, he mentioned it might make sense >> to move the companions code into chainsaw. >> What do you think on that? >> >> I like the idea - less releases, and no other interested parties in >> having companions. >> >> Please comment, when you can :-) >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org