On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think pulling in component would make sense...no one else probably uses > it. Receivers? I suppose if they were built as a separate jar that'd be > fine too, I have no idea who uses them if anyone.
We can always cut them out again if somebody wants it - which is very unlikely. If you are fine with moving them to chainsaw... do you need any help? > > Scott > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: >> >> At this point I'm only focusing only on 2.0. I've been wondering if I >> should create a subproject for chainsaw or if it should remain separate. I >> already moved a large part of extras in as a core part of the functionality. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> >> > Scott, >> > >> > Curt had an interesting idea lately, he mentioned it might make sense >> > to move the companions code into chainsaw. >> > What do you think on that? >> > >> > I like the idea - less releases, and no other interested parties in >> > having companions. >> > >> > Please comment, when you can :-) >> > >> > Cheers >> > Christian >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
