Thanks Christian, Extras are useful and should be kept around as is, unless we choose to pull them back in to core...
I agree, replacing companions with just extras seems to be a good choice. Scott On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK, I pulled receivers and component companion sources into Chainsaw in > svn > > 1178304. Is deleting the entire component and receivers companions > > hierarchy from svn sufficient or do I need to do something else? > > we need to update the website, i can help here if you like > > > There is also the question of 'companions' only being one now (extras) - > not > > sure what to do site-wise about that. Maybe completely remove companions > > and just replace with 'extras'? Or keep companions and only have extras > in > > it? > > Who is actually using extras? probably its time to go to attic too as > there is no development interest (have not a clue here). > > Anyway I would remove the companions completely and replace it with > extras, as you suggested. > > Cheers > Christian > > > > > Scott > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier < > grobme...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > I would need to make a new release of Chainsaw after the log4j release > >> > at > >> > some point, assuming I needed other things from the updated version of > >> > log4j, but right now Chainsaw depends on 1.2.16 and bundles it in the > >> > standalone and DMG builds...so I think I'm ok.. (?) > >> > >> Yes, of course you are. I was thinking in the wrong direction. Seems > >> as I practice the "style of the drunken programmer" today. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Scott > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Christian Grobmeier > >> > <grobme...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > I'm leaning toward keeping them in the same package location - when > >> >> > log4j is > >> >> > released, I can remove the classes from Chainsaw and everything > will > >> >> > still > >> >> > work. > >> >> > >> >> But you need to make a new release of chainsaw together with the new > >> >> release of log4j, right? > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Scott > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier > >> >> > <grobme...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy < > scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from > >> >> >> > receivers in > >> >> >> > 1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these > >> >> >> > classes > >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> > Chainsaw? I don't want a log4j release to hold up a Chainsaw > >> >> >> > release. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I doubt there will be a new log4j release in near future. > Therefore > >> >> >> I > >> >> >> am +1 on making Chainsaw independent. To my knowledge it is only 3 > >> >> >> classes or so, I would go with duplicating them. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> But I think I would change the package to prevent a conflict with > a > >> >> >> later log4j which might have the same classes > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Scott > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Scott Deboy > >> >> >> > <scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Definitely! > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Anything to simplify things and get this out the door! > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks for all your help Christian, > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Scott > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier > >> >> >> >> <grobme...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy > >> >> >> >>> <scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > ok, moving ahead with removal then > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel > >> >> >> >>> good, > >> >> >> >>> hope it is the same feeling for you :-) > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier > >> >> >> >>> > <grobme...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >>> > wrote: > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy > >> >> >> >>> >> <scott.de...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> >> > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful > >> >> >> >>> >> > bits > >> >> >> >>> >> > in > >> >> >> >>> >> > to > >> >> >> >>> >> > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent > maven > >> >> >> >>> >> > project > >> >> >> >>> >> > then? > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes. > >> >> >> >>> >> I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the > attic > >> >> >> >>> >> then > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> Christian > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Scott > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold > >> >> >> >>> >> > <carn...@apache.org> > >> >> >> >>> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make > >> >> >> >>> >> >> Chainsaw > >> >> >> >>> >> >> an > >> >> >> >>> >> >> OSGi > >> >> >> >>> >> >> package and no need to add additional work. > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> -- > >> >> >> >>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> >> >> >>> >> log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> >> >>> >> log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >> >>> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> >> >>> log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
