So we're good then? Logo D?
On 6 June 2014 16:15, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I don’t think a runoff is needed. If you look at round 2 in the STV > results it looks to me that H should have been eliminated instead of A. > > Ralph > > On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd support A in the case of a run-off vote. It has a number 2 in it > rather subtly :) > > > On 6 June 2014 15:45, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6 Jun 2014, at 22:13, Paul Benedict wrote: >> >>> By nonbonding, Ralph means to say there is no secured money behind my >>> vote. >>> >> >> hahaha :-) It took me almost a minute to find the joke :) >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I should also add that the results below do not include Paul’s >>>> nonbonding >>>> vote. He selected A as his top choice which would have given it the most >>>> first place votes. >>>> >>> >> As the "winner" of this contest I would like to offer to reconsider. >> When I look on the votes below, it looks like some of the voters really >> dislike >> my version of the logo - its more love or hate it. >> >> Logo A on the other side seems to be "Ok" for most of us, some liking it >> more >> than others. >> >> With that being said, I would prefer to have a logo which works for us >> "most" >> than one which is loved by 50% and hated by the other 50%. >> >> In addition I think Murads logo is more artistic than mine. >> >> Now, if others agree I would be fine with: >> >> - just choosing A as it feels more like a real consensus >> - doing a A vs D vote to make sure what people want >> >> I know this was maybe not covered by the rules, if you see that the >> "winner" >> has no problem with a run off vote... personally I think we should do >> that. >> >> Regards >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Below are the results from STV as calculated by >>>> http://paul-lockett.co.uk/stv.html. This indicates that D is the >>>> winning >>>> logo. However, after looking at the votes it isn’t clear to me why A >>>> isn’t >>>> the winner as it had more first and second place votes. also, if you go >>>> through the votes and rank A and D based on which is ranked highest in >>>> each >>>> vote you would get A - 4, D - 3. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> >>>> SINGLE TRANSFERABLE VOTE COUNTER >>>> *Candidates=9 Seats=1 Votes=7 Quota=3.5* >>>> >>>> Raw votes >>>> vote 1: (D) (A) (B) (I) (E) (F) (H) (G) (C) >>>> vote 2: (D) (B) (A) (H) (C) (I) (E) (F) (G) >>>> vote 3: (H) (E) (F) (A) (B) (C) (I) (G) (D) >>>> vote 4: (G) (C) (D) (I) (H) (F) (A) (B) (E) >>>> vote 5: (H) (G) (I) (A) (E) (F) (B) (D) (C) >>>> vote 6: (A) (C) (B) (H) (G) (D) (I) (E) (F) >>>> vote 7: (A) (B) (D) (H) (C) (E) (F) (G) (I) >>>> *Round 1 votes* >>>> >>>> vote 1: (D) (A) (B) (I) (E) (F) (H) (G) (C) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 2: (D) (B) (A) (H) (C) (I) (E) (F) (G) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 3: (H) (E) (F) (A) (B) (C) (I) (G) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 4: (G) (C) (D) (I) (H) (F) (A) (B) (E) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 5: (H) (G) (I) (A) (E) (F) (B) (D) (C) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 6: (A) (C) (B) (H) (G) (D) (I) (E) (F) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 7: (A) (B) (D) (H) (C) (E) (F) (G) (I) vote value = 1 >>>> A = 2 >>>> B = 0 >>>> C = 0 >>>> D = 2 >>>> E = 0 >>>> F = 0 >>>> G = 1 >>>> H = 2 >>>> I = 0 >>>> >>>> Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1. >>>> Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 1. >>>> G is eliminated. >>>> *Round 2 votes* >>>> >>>> vote 1: (D) (A) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 2: (D) (A) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 3: (H) (A) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 4: (D) (H) (A) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 5: (H) (A) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 6: (A) (H) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 7: (A) (D) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> A = 2 >>>> B = 0 >>>> C = 0 >>>> D = 3 >>>> E = 0 >>>> F = 0 >>>> G = 0 >>>> H = 2 >>>> I = 0 >>>> >>>> Fewest votes won by a candidate = 2. >>>> Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 2. >>>> The tiebreaker loser is A. >>>> A is eliminated. >>>> *Round 3 votes* >>>> >>>> vote 1: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 2: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 3: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 4: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 5: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 6: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >>>> vote 7: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >>>> A = 0 >>>> B = 0 >>>> C = 0 >>>> D = 4 >>>> E = 0 >>>> F = 0 >>>> G = 0 >>>> H = 3 >>>> I = 0 >>>> >>>> Most votes currently held by a candidate = 4. >>>> Number of candidates with the greatest number of votes = 1. >>>> D has exceeded the quota and is elected. If there are seats remaining to >>>> be filled, the surplus will now be reallocated. >>>> *The election is complete and the elected candidates are (D).* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> My vote: ABDHCEFGI >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> On 3 Jun 2014, at 22:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>> >>>> It is time to select a logo. The list of candidates can be found at >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations as those having at >>>> least two supporters and are arbitrarily identified as A through I. >>>> >>>> This vote will use STV to calculate the results. This means your vote >>>> should consist of from 1 to 9 letters identifying the logos in order of >>>> preference from first to last. >>>> >>>> The key idea to keep in mind is that the ordering of your votes is >>>> crucial. Those who you *really* want to be elected should be at the >>>> beginning/start of the list. For example: >>>> >>>> Aragorn, Frodo, Bilbo, Sam, Sauron, Gandalf, Treebeard, Gollum, Gimli >>>> >>>> means that you really want Aragorn to be elected (he’s your primary >>>> preferred person), followed by Frodo (you want Frodo on the board more >>>> than >>>> you want Bilbo, Sam and Sauron, but not as much as you want Aragorn), >>>> followed by Bilbo, etc… >>>> >>>> In this vote only the top logo will be selected but STV will identify >>>> the >>>> winner using all the votes. >>>> >>>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours. In accordance with the rules >>>> listed in LOG4J2-316 votes of all Logging committers are binding. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>>> @grobmeier >>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> --- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> @grobmeier >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
