Although logo D “won” in the STV results below (and it was my first choice), I think A should actually be the winner. So no, I don’t think we are good yet.
Ralph On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > So we're good then? Logo D? > > > On 6 June 2014 16:15, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I don’t think a runoff is needed. If you look at round 2 in the STV results > it looks to me that H should have been eliminated instead of A. > > Ralph > > On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd support A in the case of a run-off vote. It has a number 2 in it rather >> subtly :) >> >> >> On 6 June 2014 15:45, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6 Jun 2014, at 22:13, Paul Benedict wrote: >> By nonbonding, Ralph means to say there is no secured money behind my vote. >> >> hahaha :-) It took me almost a minute to find the joke :) >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> >> I should also add that the results below do not include Paul’s nonbonding >> vote. He selected A as his top choice which would have given it the most >> first place votes. >> >> As the "winner" of this contest I would like to offer to reconsider. >> When I look on the votes below, it looks like some of the voters really >> dislike >> my version of the logo - its more love or hate it. >> >> Logo A on the other side seems to be "Ok" for most of us, some liking it more >> than others. >> >> With that being said, I would prefer to have a logo which works for us "most" >> than one which is loved by 50% and hated by the other 50%. >> >> In addition I think Murads logo is more artistic than mine. >> >> Now, if others agree I would be fine with: >> >> - just choosing A as it feels more like a real consensus >> - doing a A vs D vote to make sure what people want >> >> I know this was maybe not covered by the rules, if you see that the "winner" >> has no problem with a run off vote... personally I think we should do that. >> >> Regards >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> Ralph >> >> On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Below are the results from STV as calculated by >> http://paul-lockett.co.uk/stv.html. This indicates that D is the winning >> logo. However, after looking at the votes it isn’t clear to me why A isn’t >> the winner as it had more first and second place votes. also, if you go >> through the votes and rank A and D based on which is ranked highest in each >> vote you would get A - 4, D - 3. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Ralph >> >> >> SINGLE TRANSFERABLE VOTE COUNTER >> *Candidates=9 Seats=1 Votes=7 Quota=3.5* >> >> Raw votes >> vote 1: (D) (A) (B) (I) (E) (F) (H) (G) (C) >> vote 2: (D) (B) (A) (H) (C) (I) (E) (F) (G) >> vote 3: (H) (E) (F) (A) (B) (C) (I) (G) (D) >> vote 4: (G) (C) (D) (I) (H) (F) (A) (B) (E) >> vote 5: (H) (G) (I) (A) (E) (F) (B) (D) (C) >> vote 6: (A) (C) (B) (H) (G) (D) (I) (E) (F) >> vote 7: (A) (B) (D) (H) (C) (E) (F) (G) (I) >> *Round 1 votes* >> >> vote 1: (D) (A) (B) (I) (E) (F) (H) (G) (C) vote value = 1 >> vote 2: (D) (B) (A) (H) (C) (I) (E) (F) (G) vote value = 1 >> vote 3: (H) (E) (F) (A) (B) (C) (I) (G) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 4: (G) (C) (D) (I) (H) (F) (A) (B) (E) vote value = 1 >> vote 5: (H) (G) (I) (A) (E) (F) (B) (D) (C) vote value = 1 >> vote 6: (A) (C) (B) (H) (G) (D) (I) (E) (F) vote value = 1 >> vote 7: (A) (B) (D) (H) (C) (E) (F) (G) (I) vote value = 1 >> A = 2 >> B = 0 >> C = 0 >> D = 2 >> E = 0 >> F = 0 >> G = 1 >> H = 2 >> I = 0 >> >> Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1. >> Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 1. >> G is eliminated. >> *Round 2 votes* >> >> vote 1: (D) (A) (H) vote value = 1 >> vote 2: (D) (A) (H) vote value = 1 >> vote 3: (H) (A) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 4: (D) (H) (A) vote value = 1 >> vote 5: (H) (A) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 6: (A) (H) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 7: (A) (D) (H) vote value = 1 >> A = 2 >> B = 0 >> C = 0 >> D = 3 >> E = 0 >> F = 0 >> G = 0 >> H = 2 >> I = 0 >> >> Fewest votes won by a candidate = 2. >> Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 2. >> The tiebreaker loser is A. >> A is eliminated. >> *Round 3 votes* >> >> vote 1: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >> vote 2: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >> vote 3: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 4: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >> vote 5: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 6: (H) (D) vote value = 1 >> vote 7: (D) (H) vote value = 1 >> A = 0 >> B = 0 >> C = 0 >> D = 4 >> E = 0 >> F = 0 >> G = 0 >> H = 3 >> I = 0 >> >> Most votes currently held by a candidate = 4. >> Number of candidates with the greatest number of votes = 1. >> D has exceeded the quota and is elected. If there are seats remaining to >> be filled, the surplus will now be reallocated. >> *The election is complete and the elected candidates are (D).* >> >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> My vote: ABDHCEFGI >> >> Thanks! >> >> On 3 Jun 2014, at 22:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> It is time to select a logo. The list of candidates can be found at >> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations as those having at >> least two supporters and are arbitrarily identified as A through I. >> >> This vote will use STV to calculate the results. This means your vote >> should consist of from 1 to 9 letters identifying the logos in order of >> preference from first to last. >> >> The key idea to keep in mind is that the ordering of your votes is >> crucial. Those who you *really* want to be elected should be at the >> beginning/start of the list. For example: >> >> Aragorn, Frodo, Bilbo, Sam, Sauron, Gandalf, Treebeard, Gollum, Gimli >> >> means that you really want Aragorn to be elected (he’s your primary >> preferred person), followed by Frodo (you want Frodo on the board more than >> you want Bilbo, Sam and Sauron, but not as much as you want Aragorn), >> followed by Bilbo, etc… >> >> In this vote only the top logo will be selected but STV will identify the >> winner using all the votes. >> >> This vote will remain open for 72 hours. In accordance with the rules >> listed in LOG4J2-316 votes of all Logging committers are binding. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> --- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> @grobmeier >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> @grobmeier >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
