Thanks.
While I realize resources are needed to make any changes to the code base, even
if resources are/become available it's yet another (big?) decision on whether
the changes that are made to log4net are ones which will take it off into its
own direction or whether a new version of log4net is created which is a port of
lo4j2.
Thanks,
Nick
________________________________
From: Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 12:18 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
On 2016-10-03, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Just curious if anyone has any feedback?
I think I've written this before, but in case I haven't:
Whether a port of log4j 2.x will happen depends on whether people show
up who want to do the porting work. This hasn't happened, yet.
Cheers
Stefan
