* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Andy Wardley wrote:
> 
> > So without wishing to start another holy war, is it possible to change
> > the mailing list configuration to have a more sensible default Reply-to?
> 
> <rant>
> I have arguments with Leon about this. He usually quotes 'Reply To
> munging considered harmful'
> (http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) but as I keep trying to
> point out to him this document is bollocks.
> 
> The main statemests it makes are ...
> 

i'm ignoring all your points ....

reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,

it means when you reply to a message you reply to author of
that message, when you reply-all you reply to all

its just the right thing

so there 

Reply via email to