On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:33:34PM +0000, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,
> > it means when you reply to a message you reply to author of
> > that message, when you reply-all you reply to all
> No. When you reply-all it replies to the sender *AND* the list. So the
> sender gets two copies of everything. Which is just fricking irritating
> *AND* a waste of bandwidth.
So you use list-reply like sensible people.
Or you actually take the time to pay attention to who you're sending
the message to.
Aargh. help! i'm being drawn in!
Michael
