On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:10:11PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Ah, but with perl code there is a definite 'correct' parsing (whatever
> /usr/bin/perl does[1]) but with the English language that isn't true.
I'm afraid that's as silly as me declaring that there's only one correct
parsing of English, and that's how *I* parse it.
--
For true believers, LORD would be K\textsc{nuth} in TeX, and
L\textsc{amport} in LaTeX. Atheists prefer \phantom{LORD}. Agnostics
may need to use the ifthen package.
- Chris Boyd, comp.text.tex
- Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Alex Page
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Jon Eyre
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Greg McCarroll
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Mark Fowler
- Language (was Re: Grammar (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Greg McCarroll
- RE: Linux.com Online Chat dcross - David Cross
