On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:31:41AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Perl is easier to parse simply because all the irregularities are known
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and documented. They're not in English. In addition to the above
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Uhm, where?
> "The British Left Waffles on Argentina"
Perl beginners look away now. You're not going to enjoy this. :)
sub four { $_[0]x4 }; print four things;
open four, "/dev/null"; print four things;
package four; use subs qw(print); sub print{die@_}; print four things;
# (Why doesn't that one work properly?)
(And that's even without playing with sub things{})
Perl requires a similar amount of knowledge to parse, although the
knowledge is rather more domain specific - what subs are defined, what globs
are available, what packages are defined, what filehandles are open, and so
on.
--
<Sauvin> Remember: amateurs built the Ark; _professionals_ built the
Titantic.
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Mark Fowler
- RE: Linux.com Online Chat dcross - David Cross
- Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Alex Page
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Jon Eyre
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Greg McCarroll
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Mark Fowler
- Language (was Re: Grammar (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Greg McCarroll
- RE: Linux.com Online Chat dcross - David Cross
