On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:31:41AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote: > Perl is easier to parse simply because all the irregularities are known ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > and documented. They're not in English. In addition to the above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Uhm, where? > "The British Left Waffles on Argentina" Perl beginners look away now. You're not going to enjoy this. :) sub four { $_[0]x4 }; print four things; open four, "/dev/null"; print four things; package four; use subs qw(print); sub print{die@_}; print four things; # (Why doesn't that one work properly?) (And that's even without playing with sub things{}) Perl requires a similar amount of knowledge to parse, although the knowledge is rather more domain specific - what subs are defined, what globs are available, what packages are defined, what filehandles are open, and so on. -- <Sauvin> Remember: amateurs built the Ark; _professionals_ built the Titantic.
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Mark Fowler
- RE: Linux.com Online Chat dcross - David Cross
- Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Alex Page
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Paul Makepeace
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat) Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online C... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Onli... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com... Mark Fowler
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Jon Eyre
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Simon Cozens
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Greg McCarroll
- Re: Grammar (was: Re: Linux... Mark Fowler
- Language (was Re: Grammar (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Linux.com Online Chat Greg McCarroll
- RE: Linux.com Online Chat dcross - David Cross