Re: BOFHs requiring license

[Greg McCarroll]

* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> 
> > But given that the Socialist Alliance are only standing in ~100 
> > constituencies, there doesn't seem to be any credible alternative.
> 
> http://www.socialistalliance.net/constituencies/constitlist.htm for the
> complete list.
> 

ok i reserve the right to quit this thread at any time, however ....

But hasn't `new' labour's example shown that there is no place for
socialism in modern government? Hasn't their move to capitalism been
really a well spun admission of defeat? How can any socialist not
feel that when it came to the crunch socialism was rejected by
intelligent people who understood its principals and benefits
intimitadly because they could see it would not work for modern
Britain?



-- 
Greg McCarroll                          http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net