That's an interesting discussion! At least in my region, these titles are often used in job advertisements. These titles have obviously become commonplace.

And I have just noticed that the LPI still uses these titles on official documents: On a recently issued LPIC-2 certificate (PDF version) there is an emblem on the top left, saying "Linux Engineer".

But it's good to know that these are no longer the official designations. Thanks for the information!


Am 27.02.24 um 05:45 schrieb Ted Matsumura via lpi-examdev:
In the early 2000s to mid 2000s, I taught Windows Server, AD and Networking (2000/2008/2008R2) at the college level. During that time MS changed their Cert family names from MSCE where the E stood for Engineer to MSCA A=Associate. It was due to the Engineer title. I don't recall which country or industry was concerned about it, but that was the reason we were given. The college was also a Pearson/Vue test center, and the tests all had to be renamed.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 3:20 PM G. Matthew Rice via lpi-examdev <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:54 PM Anselm Lingnau via lpi-examdev
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        There are many places where you don't get to call yourself an
        “engineer”
        unless you are properly licensed as one (like, civil engineer,
        electrical
        engineer, etc.) and are a member of good standing of the
        relevant professional
        body. “Linux Engineers”, even with a certificate from the LPI,
        are not proper
        engineers in such places, and trying to pass yourself off as
        one may have Dire
        Consequences.


    It's nice that IT folk frequently operate on an "it's easier to
    ask forgiveness than permission" mentality. We never had any
    complaints about the use of Linux Engineer from any regulatory
    body.  I do recall one licensed engineer from the USA emailed us
    to express his displeasure, though.  I mentioned the acrimony,
    right? :)

    There was a kerfuffle between the Professional Engineers of Canada
    and Microsoft 10 years ago.  It went back and forth but eventually
    resolved as something along the lines of you need to be a licensed
    professional engineer to call yourself a "Professional Engineer"
    (in Canada, we put "P.Eng." on the end of our names) but using
    non-regulated titles like "sanitation engineer" were beyond the
    purview of the various provincial regulatory bodies.

    Or they reached an impasse and everyone got bored of the subject. 
    It's been a while.

    Regardless, there was agreement that Engineer isn't an appropriate
    title for LPIC-2 so I don't expect that, if someone pitched it
    again, the request would be successful.

    Take care,
    --matt

        This applies to other titles that IT professionals might want
        to use, too.
        Many years ago some distant colleagues got into trouble for
        calling their
        company “Architects of VoIP”, when here in Germany, architects
        are people who
        design physical buildings and oversee their construction. The
        real architects
        are *very* protective of their turf – to a point where their
        professional body
        will come down like the proverbial ton of bricks on anyone who
        has the
        temerity to style themselves, e.g., a “software architect” on
        their business
        card and does not happen to have appropriate
        building-architect credentials to
        back that up. So, those “Architects of VoIP” quickly had to
        get new
        letterheads printed.

        Anselm
-- Anselm Lingnau · [email protected] · https://www.tuxcademy.org
        Freie Schulungsmaterialien für Linux und Open-Source-Software
        Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software


        _______________________________________________
        lpi-examdev mailing list
        [email protected]
        https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev



-- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]>                         gpg id:
    0x17CF9077
    Executive Director, Linux Professional Institute
    _______________________________________________
    lpi-examdev mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev


_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to