Agreed. SNMP machines are very popular, moreso than RAID even ;) Also,
more easily to test on in a limited question set. The RAID thing mostly
just has me worried, with having enough exam space to do the topic
justice. RAID is an advanced topic.

- Kara Pritchard, RHCE
A.D. for Program Development

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, John Janachowski wrote:

> You may have already considered this:
> I'd suggest that SNMP be included as well, such as snmptrap, snmpget, 
> snmpwalk, etc.  After all, after it's all implemented, how do you manage 
> it?
> 
> Thanks,
> John Janachowski
> 
> 
> ----------
> From:         daan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Wednesday, January 26, 2000 4:20 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: LPIC-2 Job Description - Review & Comments Requested
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Chuck Mead wrote:
> 
> CM:>On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Dan York said:
> CM:>DY>Chuck, Kara, & co...
> 
> ...
> 
> CM:>DY>> mentioned above. We are going to need to pound NFS/NIS, Samba, 
> DNS,
> IMAP, DHCP,
> CM:>DY>> SMTP, and I suggest that we add OpenLDAP into the mix. It's being
> included with
> CM:>DY>> many of the distro's now and Novell is kicking their contributions 
> out
> under OSS
> CM:>DY>> licenses of some type. It may seem like an altogether specialized 
> area
> but I
> CM:>DY>> think that we should at least examine the issue to see where it  
>  leads.
> CM:>DY>
> CM:>DY>I'm not sure... yes, we need to hit the topics hard, especially in 
> my
> mind DHCP
> CM:>DY>and
> CM:>DY>NFS, but we've always talked that there could be Level 3 exams on 
> mail
> servers
> CM:>DY>(SMTP, IMAP) and also Windows integration (advanced Samba).  There 
> could
> also
> CM:>DY>be one on directory services that could include OpenLDAP and you 
> could
> make the
> CM:>DY>case that NIS (and NIS+) could fall into that category as well.
> CM:>DY>
> CM:>DY>My only concern is that if we include the advanced discussion of 
> those
> topics
> CM:>DY>here at Level 2, how much will we take away from what could be in a 
> Level
> 3?
> CM:>
> CM:>I think this is a coverage issue, not one of depth. Level 3 should be a
> depth
> CM:>thing but we're going to have to start covering stuff here because a 
> Level 2
> CM:>hero is gonna have to to have a broad level of expertise and 
> experience!
> CM:>
> CM:>DY>> >Topic 5: Security
> CM:>DY><snip>
> CM:>DY>
> CM:>DY>> I am going to bring it up now... what do folks think about testing
> xinetd? It is
> CM:>DY>> much more configurable than wrappers and provides a higher level 
> of
> security
> CM:>DY>> when properly implemented!
> CM:>DY>
> CM:>DY>But is xinetd standard will all the major distros?
> CM:>
> CM:>I don't know (and we need to answer this question) but at some point as 
> we
> deal
> CM:>with certifying "Advanced" Linux sys-admins we're going to have to 
> start
> dealing
> CM:>with *what is* in the world of Linux instead of what the distros think 
> *is*.
>          ^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Very to the point if I may mix in. You are talking advanced here
> aren't you? I would like to add OpenSSH to that list. And I am
> missing/overlooking apache which should be present on all levels
> except for some specialized ones.
> 
> Is there at some level a topic on (installing and maintaining)
> programming tools? I mean Perl, Java, Python, Smalltalk, Eiffel
> etcetera, not the standard stuff. And I don't mean programming but
> maintaining the tools.
> 
> Another one: is emacs covered? (I missed lisp above, didn't I)
> 
> 
> 
> :wq!
> 
> Daan Hoogland                      Unix consultants      v   v
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     OO developers       \ /
>                                  ###   ##    ##  #     >---X---<
> http://snow.nl                  #     #  #  #  # #  #  #  / \
> Snow B.V.                        ##   #  #  #  # #  #  # ^   ^
> Tel. (+31)418-653333               #  #  #  #  # #  #  #
> Fax. (+31)418-653666            ###   #  #   ##   ## ##
> 
> 
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> to leave the list.
> 


--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
to leave the list.

Reply via email to