On 26 Jan 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Chuck Mead wrote:

>> It's my opinion that the Level III exams are intended to provide a
>> certification avenue for high level Linux folk who want to
>> specialize. For this reason the rubber meets the road in *THIS*
>> level for the enterprise level services you've mentioned above. ...

Kara responded:

> LDAP? Hmn.. Definitely something to survey on, but I think LDAP,
> though being packaged, isn't commonly used by Level II
> sysadmins. It's typically in a larger environment, or used by
> specialized individuals. Definitely fit in something Level III
> related..  Thoughts?

I suspect that the difference here highlights two fundamentally
opposed ways of thinking about what Level III is.  Either it is "top
tier admin certification" or it is "for folks who want to specialize".

We have to decide which of those Level III will be, for useful
discussion of what to include/exclude from Level II to be possible at
all.

Who is expected to attempt Level III LPI certification?  Is it for

(a) folk who want to specialize, that is, demonstrate a few special
skills within the Linux admin universe

or is it

(b) experienced corporate level admins who want to attest to their
overall high skill and knowledge levels at dealing with complex or
large scale "enterprise-level" system administration, as a whole

I don't know the answer.  But until there *is* one, it is going to be
very hard to sensibly discuss what to include in (or exclude from)
Level II.

Could someone (anyone) clarify this, please?

Thanks,

Jonathan
--
Jonathan Marsden        | Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     | Making electronic 
12 Etterby Lea Crescent | Phone: +44 1228 615100        | communications work 
Carlisle, Cumbria       | Fax:   +1 (360) 838-6157      | reliably for Christian 
England CA3  9LG        | http://www.xc.org/jonathan    | missions worldwide 

--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
to leave the list.

Reply via email to