FWIW, I strongly concur with Mr. Dowling. An open but vastly
comprehensive framework cannot be devalued by test-prep guides.
Matt
Matt Benjamin President/CTO
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
pgr. 734-431-0118
>
> If you have enough questions, with only a random selection used for each
> exam, such guides cease to be a problem. If every objective has 200 or 500
> or however many questions, the "swot for the test" method becomes
> impractical. You can't remember that many answers. For that matter, the
> process of learning the answers to all those questions would pretty much
> entails comprehensively gaining the knowledge that's being tested for.
> Either way, it works out OK. I admit you couold get an idiot with eidetic
> memory walk in and pass the test without any real understanding, but I think
> that will be rare enough not to worry about.
>
> --
> Politas
> http://www.workspot.net/~politas/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
>
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
