Michael Dowling wrote: >> It seems to me that making the items public allows for greater numbers of editors and testers, since there is no longer any need to keep them secret while doing so. << However, making the items public will also give rise to "exam prep" guides of the worst kind, which just drill the "students" with the answers to multiple-choice questions, with no understanding whatsoever. At that point, I'd consider the LPI certification to be devalued beyond repair. Best, --- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au] -- This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list. Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to leave the list.
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Jeff Dean
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey David A. Bandel
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Les Bell
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey jb
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Tom Peters
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey kara
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Michael Dowling
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Alan Mead
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Alan Mead
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Michael Dowling
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Les Bell
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Michael Dowling
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Les Bell
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Matt Benjamin
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Tom Peters
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey chuck
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Matt Benjamin
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey chuck
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey David Weeks
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey chuck
- Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey Alan Mead
