On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Matt Benjamin spewed into the bitstream:
MB>
MB>Tom,
MB>
MB>One of us--probably I/me--misread the original statement.
MB>
MB>There is no reason to expose the text of exam questions. This should not
MB>be done.
MB>
MB>However, sometimes it seems that this is conflated with the notion of
MB>publishing detailed specifications about the subject matter those
MB>questions cover. I.e., a fear that, if the published objectives are too
MB>detailed, then it will "expose" the probable questions on exams,
MB>destroying their value.
MB>
MB>If my intuition is right, then we are putting too much emphasis on what
MB>must remain hidden,
I don't think so... I've only been responding to the proposal that our
question pool be made public.
MB>and instead we should be focussed on the completeness and
MB>precision of exam requirements--which should be open to all.
...and they are! :-)
http://www.lpi.org/cgi-bin/poms.py
--
Chuck Mead, chuck -AT- moongroup.com, Owner, MoonGroup.com
(Note: html formatted email sent to me is filtered & deleted unread)
GnuPG Public Key Available: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
