Hi Bryan,

> I agree that the JTA will flush everything out.  *HOWEVER*, a key detail
> to that will be that people realize what things like Winbindd can be
> used for, beyond just Samba file services.  E.g., remember that Samba
> just provides Winbindd, Samba doesn't just provide Winbindd for Samba
> only. 

And why having winbind as part of the samba exam and not as part of the auth 
exam would prevent
this? And in the real world, how many companies use winbind without other samba 
services? We should
test for common scenarios and not for the exception ones. We can't test for all 
conceivable
scenarios. :-)

On the other side, how could someone manage a winbind server and not knowing 
the remaining samba
stuff?


[]s, Fernando Lozano

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to