Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer wrote:
> No comment but one question: what about per client licences that a Win
> server needs for each connected client?

Still negligible to TCO.

> Sorry to interrupt again and without disagreeing about the benefit of
> Samba & Linux: decisions aren't taken from a technical point of view. If
> it was so, then we wouldn't live in a Windows world.

Integration decisions are _always_ made from a technical point-of-view.
I don't care what enterprise you are, this is reality.

You're mixing "marketing" and "product" decisions with technical ones.
We need to test to _technical_ ones, even if the exam names are
"marketed."

> Oh, Bryan, why do you have to misinterpret everything I write? You know
> exactly what I meant with risks: the risks not being owner of my own
> data any more and having to use somebody's software (and all expensive
> updates) to access them. I was *not* talking about software issues.-

No, I got 100% of your point.  And you're continuing to miss mine.  I
don't want my basic enterprise object authentication and naming
information on a Windows Server if I can help it -- even if I sync to
it.

> You wrote more than once! Probably is your definition of cheap not
> compatible to mine.

LPIC-3 should not be an exam set that _limits_ what you can do with
Linux in an enterprise to what Windows can control or use.  It should be
an exam set that is based on UNIX/Linux being the _backbone_ of your
enterprise, and not just for Windows.

And that includes in how the Samba exam should be written, or any exams
that complement it with or without Samba file services, but general
UNIX-Linux and Windows interoperability.  I'm not interested in writing
objectives and tasks to an exam that tests standalone/department-level
integration that I can get out of a cookbook.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith           Professional, technical annoyance
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------
The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup
of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done.


_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to