"Bryan J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 00:22 -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > > Moving on to ideas for the future, before adding anything to the wiki > > I'd like to hear some opinions and understand better how LPI feels about > > developer certifications. Because my main work is as a developer and I
As a quick answer, the demand to make it cost effective from a marketing point of view isn't there. From a technical point of view, I don't care. There wasn't any proof of demand for LPIC-1 either. I straddle the developer and admin camps a lot but consider myself more of a developer (at least preference-wise). So I would like to see a road map developed for an OSS developer programme. After the LPIC-3 roadmap, though. Also, I see no problem in partnering with others to fill out the exams, too. I've spoken with some people at Zend and they did create their certification in a manner that fits with LPI (psychometrics, etc). If it makes sense to offer 'credit' for the Zend PHP cert, I'm all for it. > I'd like to stay focused on 2006 developments for now. I believe there > is a dedicated wiki for future developments -- including lab-based and > other testing. Don't start going off on non-administration concepts > before we even get started on the administrative stuff. ;-> I agree. -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
