"Bryan J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. After that, go back in 2007 and and rev LPI 100** and 200 objectives > and exams to better match in a new 2008+ release
Heh, you read my mind. I haven't announced it anywhere but internally but I would like to start a new JTA for level 1/2 in early 2007 (nothing official yet, though). > [ **NOTE: That would include separating out the "non-technical" stuff > from LPI 101/102 into the (previously discussed) "LinuxCore" (level 0) > web cert. ] Yes. As well, some may just have to go. That whole newgroup/tldp/... section doesn't work well outside of englishland. > One thing that I really don't want to professionally hear is that LPIC-3 > concepts I've been suggesting are "too hard" or "not applicable" to a > function. If you want to explore services on their own more, then they > should go into the LPIC-1 and LPIC-2 revisions. We have already covered > NFS and Samba basics in LPIC-1 and LPIC-2. Hmm, I thought that we agreed not to discuss this :) > Evan Blomquist wrote: > > I would also like to suggest that we rename the LPIC-3 exam as, 'The > > Bryan J. Smith memorial' -- because I think his head is about to explode. > > Why? I'm just very strongly opinionated. If I didn't care about LPIC-3 > development, I wouldn't post with such verocity. verocity? I think that's the first typo that I've seen out of you. Or is that some kind of combination of velocity and verbosity? Just kidding. Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
