Fernando Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also feel there's great demand for a LPI developer certification, and > maybe LPI marketing did not find that because people were already used to > see LPI as network-only certification.
I think that it's more that they weren't looking for it. LPIC-3 is something that has been promised for years now. This is just the fulfillment of that promise. A developer cert has definitely been discussed. Just no promises. > I understand Matt's concern about leaving other discussions for after we > advance in the JTA for LPIC-3, but if people are interested in developer > certifications they'll discuss it anyway. Maybe there could be another > mailing list for this, so lpi-examdev can focus on LPIC-3 and not be > disturbed by other discussions like hands-on exams. Even if LPI cannot > implement those ideas now (and even if it never decides to implement them) > it's usefull to let the discussion go on and have it archived somewhere. I don't think that we need another list for that discussion. My point is just that a few of us won't be paying it much attention while focused on LPIC-3 development. This is an open list. And as long as two general rules are observed, anything is discussable. Those rules are no flame wars (arguments are fine, though ;) and no discussing exam content (ie. the real questions on the exams). Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
