On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Fernando Lozano <[email protected]>wrote:
> I agree. Is there a way for voting on those issues, so this kind of > feedback can be prioritized during development of the updated LPI exams? > The way to "vote" is simple ... "volunteer" to write them. ;) I already throw a lot of work Matt et al.'s way with my opinionated views. I've probably over-shared on not just storage, but now Samba4/SSSD. With that said ... since I brought up DM-MPIO with the iSCSI initiator, I'll volunteer myself to write an objective for DeviceMapper LVM+MPIO. I need to look through all of the objectives on the Wiki, and decide how one Objective could be written. But I think we need to break out a dedicated 200 level Objective for this. After all, when one usually uses DM-MPIO, one usually modifies the DM-LVM rules too -- especially for Boot-from-SAN. E.g., filter out the /dev/sd* devices, and only use the /dev/mapper/multipath-* devices, for LVM. -- Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith at ieee.org - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
