On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:09 PM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think there should be a more formal voting, like on some issue >> >> trackers. > > Matt, you _mis-quoted_ me and Fernando, flipping us ...
My bad. I was just counting '>'s on the left. :) Regards, --matt > > Fernando: I think there should be a more formal voting, like on some issue > trackers. > Bryan(bjs): I think any "meta-development" of social aspects distracts from > "actual > development." We're all peers. We can respect each other's input. > > Fernando: Else the objectives can be dominated by the opinion of whoever > writes > them on the wiki. ;-) > Bryan(bjs): God forbid ... something being dominated by those who -- gasp > -- volunteer > and work on them! God that's like ... well ... too "open source" like! > As always, as the sign on the animal shelter says ... > "If you don't like what you see ... volunteer!" > Seriously, there's nothing stopping more people from joining in and > modifying the > objectives. > Also remember, those who are actively development are actually very > considerate > of input. Matt Rice is a perfect example of this. He didn't become the > head of > exam development by accident. > > -- bjs > > -- > Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance > b.j.smith at ieee.org - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
