Hi, > Bryan(bjs): God forbid ... something being dominated by those who -- gasp > -- volunteer Not all usefull contributions will be on the wiki, not all volunteers will edit the wiki. And it's a pain in the heck having to check the page history to see if someone played with the wiki, deleting sugestions they didn't like.
> Also remember, those who are actively development are actually very > considerate > of input. Matt Rice is a perfect example of this. He didn't become the > head of > exam development by accident. > I never said nor implied LPI people like Matt or volunteers were a closed group, not caring from input. Sorry If I wrote something that could ne read that way! Actually I had, years ago, a professional relationship with LPI. Which made me respect and admire their work even more! The voting sugestion is something I guess wold ease their work. []s, Fernando Lozano _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
