On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Bryan J Smith <b.j.sm...@ieee.org> wrote: >> I think there should be a more formal voting, like on some issue trackers.
Bryan, take it easy ;) Actually, to make some of these processes easier like on issue trackers, sounds like a good idea. LPI does have a RT (Request Tracker) instance with _lots_ of queues going. I could look into getting one added for 'Objective Ideas/Comments'. Of course, that's the micro (mini) level. I think that it's past time to look at the entire LPIC-3 line up. Some topics like Virtualization (at least, the basics) seem to have a major push to be lowered it into the LPIC-1 (or a side exam has been suggested) for a LPI-VM cert which only requires LPIC-1 first. > God forbid ... something being dominated by those who -- gasp -- volunteer > and work on them! > God that's like ... well ... too "open source" like! I like to think that my edits have addressed everyone's concerns. I think that even Reinier is mostly pleased with the results. ;) Except maybe the ordering of the 30 objectives. -- G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
