Submitted.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 10:42 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-
> rfc7810bis-00.txt
> 
> Hi Les,
> 
> We've converged on draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt. Once updated,
> I'll immediately start a short WG adoption poll on this draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> ´╗┐On 4/3/18, 10:44 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <lsr-
> boun...@ietf.org on behalf of a...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Les,
> 
>     Can you resubmit as draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc7810bis-00.txt? Also, please 
> add a
> "Changes from RFC 7810" section to the "Introduction". I see you have added
> RFC8174 to the "Requirements Language" section already.
> 
>     I think we should accept this as an LSR Working Group document - does
> anyone disagree?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Acee
> 
>     On 3/30/18, 6:39 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <lsr-
> boun...@ietf.org on behalf of ginsb...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>         Folks -
> 
>         A bis version of RFC 7810 has been submitted to address the issue
> reported in Errata ID: 5293 https://www.rfc-
> editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7810
> 
>         Given that there exist implementations which have interpreted the
> ambiguous encoding of some sub-TLVs in different/non-interoperable ways
> it was felt that a bis version of the RFC was justified.
>         Please see the Appendix of the draft for a discussion of the changes 
> from
> RFC 7810 and the reasons why.
> 
>            Les
> 
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>         Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 3:33 PM
>         To: Qin Wu <sunse...@huawei.com>; David Ward (wardd)
> <wa...@cisco.com>; Spencer Giacolone <spencer.giacal...@gmail.com>;
> Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacal...@gmail.com>; John Drake
> <ldr...@juniper.net>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; David
> Ward (wardd) <wa...@cisco.com>; Stefano Previdi <stef...@previdi.net>
>         Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
> 
> 
>         A new version of I-D, draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
>         has been successfully submitted by Les Ginsberg and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
>         Name:         draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis
>         Revision:     00
>         Title:                IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
>         Document date:        2018-03-30
>         Group:                Individual Submission
>         Pages:                19
>         URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ginsberg-isis-
> rfc7810bis-00.txt
>         Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-isis-
> rfc7810bis/
>         Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00
>         Htmlized:       
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ginsberg-isis-
> rfc7810bis
> 
> 
>         Abstract:
>            In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
>            information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network-
>            performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to
>            data-path selection as other metrics.
> 
>            This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering
>            Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can
>            be distributed and collected in a scalable fashion.  The 
> information
>            distributed using IS-IS TE Metric Extensions can then be used to 
> make
>            path-selection decisions based on network performance.
> 
>            Note that this document only covers the mechanisms with which
>            network-performance information is distributed.  The mechanisms for
>            measuring network performance or acting on that information, once
>            distributed, are outside the scope of this document.
> 
>            This document obsoletes RFC 7810.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
>         The IETF Secretariat
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         Lsr mailing list
>         Lsr@ietf.org
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Lsr mailing list
>     Lsr@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 

--- Begin Message ---
A new version of I-D, draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Les Ginsberg and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis
Revision:       00
Title:          IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
Document date:  2018-04-09
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          19
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/
Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis


Abstract:
   In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
   information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network-
   performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to
   data-path selection as other metrics.

   This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering
   Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can
   be distributed and collected in a scalable fashion.  The information
   distributed using IS-IS TE Metric Extensions can then be used to make
   path-selection decisions based on network performance.

   Note that this document only covers the mechanisms with which
   network-performance information is distributed.  The mechanisms for
   measuring network performance or acting on that information, once
   distributed, are outside the scope of this document.

   This document obsoletes RFC 7810.


                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to