----- Original Message ----- From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 5:26 PM
> Chris - > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:32 AM > > > > I think that the only time we should include the protocol (in addition to '-lsr-') > > is if we have split documents (for whatever reason) on the same solution. > > We have an example of this actually: > > > > draft-ietf-xxxx-segment-routing-msd-09 > > draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-09 > > > > Going forward we either combine these types of documents into a single > > document (discussion started @101) so "-lsr-" is appropriate, or if there's > > some reason not to merge them then we have 2 documents that need the > > protocol identifier to disambiguate. > > > > In this case there's no ambiguity so I don't see the need of adding an extra "- > > isis-". > [Les:] RFC 7810 is xxxx specific. > There is a separate document for equivalent OSPF functionality (RFC 7471). > > My point is - the reader should not have to go through the body of the document to find out that the document is specific to a particular protocol. The document name (which is preserved in the text even when it becomes an RFC) should make that clear. > I agree. >From a purely personal point of view, I track OSPF but have no interest in the other protocol (mention of which causes my ISP to blackhole my e-mail). I filter the I-D announce list and will see notification of any I-D with OSPF in the title - any without OSPF in the title will pass under the radar. Tom Petch > Les > > > Thanks, > > Chris. > > > > Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> writes: > > > > > Well...this raises a topic on which I would like to have feedback from the > > WG. > > > > > > Combining xxxx/OSPF into one working group is fine - no argument there. > > > But, we now may be producing two classes of documents: > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
